The test uses the GPU to run 11 compute loads such as depth of field, face detection, and particle physics. Most of the results you’ve seen are CPU-focused but Apple and Nvidia are now openly beefing with each other so we present results of the laptops running Geekbench’s Compute performance benchmark. Right mouse click and select “Open in new tab” to view original image. Since results are self-reported, we don’t know under what circumstances they were run so we picked one of the higher scores reported for the M1 Max. The result for the MacBook Pro 16 M1 Max is from Geekbench’s database, which isn’t as reliable as one from a known outlet such as. How much of a difference that makes, we don’t know.įirst up is the multi-core performance of the four laptops. While Xcode has native support for Apple’s M1, it likely isn’t optimized for Intel’s Alder Lake since Clang 9.0 was released about two years ago. Xcode is on 13.2 and Clang is on version 13 as well. Geekbench documentation indicates Xcode 11.2 was used for compile versions 5.1. For each OS, the compiler and optimizations matter a lot. Up next is Primate Lab’s popular Geekbench 5 benchmark, which we’ve long joked is the Official Benchmark of Twitter due to all the arrows fired back and forth using Geekbench results as “proof.” The test is made up of 21 different short loops modelled on such workloads as AES-XTS cryptography, HTML5, image compression, gaussian blur, and the like. Right mouse click and select “open in new tab” to see original image. Apple’s laptop is primarily designed for content creation and in no universe would a rational person even try to compare an orange to a hammer, as our sister site Macworld delved into in their own M1 Max vs. The MacBook Pro 16 weighs about 4.8 pounds and features a pretty tiny 140-watt power brick along with a 16.2-inch panel with a resolution of 3456×2234 and 120Hz refresh rate. Since we don’t have access to an Apple MacBook Pro 16 ourselves, we tapped results published by other reviews, such as Anandtech, and also the user-generated results from the benchmark companies.įor what it’s worth, the MSI GE76 Raider that we used to test the Core i9 weighs more than 6 pounds (not counting its large 280-watt power brick) and is primarily aimed at gamers who love enthusiast-class features like the GeForce RTX 3080 Ti laptop GPU and 17.3-inch 360Hz 1080p panel. Basically, it’s pretty fast and easily pushes aside the older 11th-gen Intel CPUs as well as AMD’s Ryzen 5000 lineup. For the results you see below, we used the performance gathered in the course of our review of Intel’s 12th-gen Core i9-12900HK.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |